Miami –3
This looks like a repeat of last week Buffalo game. In that game, Arizona played very conservative. Some have said the weather was the reason, but I think Green was worried about turnovers by McCown and in the end, did not want to show his hand with Boldin back after going so far behind. I can’t see Miami playing it any different, keeping Arizona in 3<SUP>rd</SUP> & long. This looks like a game where both sides will be frightened to take chances and the under seems the play, but every time I bet a total I get my nuts squeezed, so hence the side.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
New Orleans +7
If you read my post regarding San Diego at halfway, then you know why I must go with The Saints. The 7 pts is, like the X Files, somewhere out there, where I don’t care. I, as usual, will be doing something more exotic and stupid that my accounts cater for, but the 7 is probably important. I could be wrong but I think this is the first time this year Howard and Grant have played together and they have the power to shutdown any passing attack. Even so, the saints will still need the Offense to step up. Should be interesting how San Diego’s so called well run Defense does against a fully fit McAllister. The more I type, the more I am convincing myself the 7 doesn’t matter, M/L here we come.
<o></o>
Some of the other stuff I have come up with this week:
<o></o>
I read a Journal of a Redskins fan that would make you empty your pockets on Detroit this Sunday. The only trouble with reading too much is you will always come up with info that would make you empty your pockets on Washington. NO BET
<o></o>
I made a point at the start of the season that when Dan Morgan is out in Carolina; unload for maximum, as without him they are dustbins against the run. Problem is, I didn’t think I would be betting the Raiders. NO BET
<o></o>
I make no bones, Pittsburgh are an illusion. I can’t wait to take them on and it will be action points when I do, because that secondary is an accident waiting to happen. Why not this Weekend? I am not enamoured with The eagles run Defense but more importantly, as I fingered a price on Betfair, my nuts went hard, never a good sign. NO BET
<o></o>
Buffalo M/L
Hopefully, if I say the spread will not matter, Old Man Ted (who is the epitome of how we should all act on here) will not come in saying he is on the other side. I have been gunning for the Jets for a long time and because I am not having a good time betting I still don’t feel confident. The Bills are improved with Magahee and playing at home will hopefully turn things around so that next weeks bets can be pressed up.
<o></o>
One final thought
People on here are always talking about money management and while I have no doubt some, like Ted are genuine in their postings; I feel the great majority are just going through the motions. I have been betting 40 years, successfully the last 18. I can honestly say, until I came to this site, I had never heard of money management. Not once over the last 20 years dealing with pro-gamblers, so called sharps did I hear any of them mention it? Maybe it’s a different environment, in Britain, we were brought up with the axiom, if it doesn’t pay flat, forget it. Just a thought.
<o></o>
Best of luck this Weekend.
<o></o>
<o></o>
This looks like a repeat of last week Buffalo game. In that game, Arizona played very conservative. Some have said the weather was the reason, but I think Green was worried about turnovers by McCown and in the end, did not want to show his hand with Boldin back after going so far behind. I can’t see Miami playing it any different, keeping Arizona in 3<SUP>rd</SUP> & long. This looks like a game where both sides will be frightened to take chances and the under seems the play, but every time I bet a total I get my nuts squeezed, so hence the side.
<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
New Orleans +7
If you read my post regarding San Diego at halfway, then you know why I must go with The Saints. The 7 pts is, like the X Files, somewhere out there, where I don’t care. I, as usual, will be doing something more exotic and stupid that my accounts cater for, but the 7 is probably important. I could be wrong but I think this is the first time this year Howard and Grant have played together and they have the power to shutdown any passing attack. Even so, the saints will still need the Offense to step up. Should be interesting how San Diego’s so called well run Defense does against a fully fit McAllister. The more I type, the more I am convincing myself the 7 doesn’t matter, M/L here we come.
<o></o>
Some of the other stuff I have come up with this week:
<o></o>
I read a Journal of a Redskins fan that would make you empty your pockets on Detroit this Sunday. The only trouble with reading too much is you will always come up with info that would make you empty your pockets on Washington. NO BET
<o></o>
I made a point at the start of the season that when Dan Morgan is out in Carolina; unload for maximum, as without him they are dustbins against the run. Problem is, I didn’t think I would be betting the Raiders. NO BET
<o></o>
I make no bones, Pittsburgh are an illusion. I can’t wait to take them on and it will be action points when I do, because that secondary is an accident waiting to happen. Why not this Weekend? I am not enamoured with The eagles run Defense but more importantly, as I fingered a price on Betfair, my nuts went hard, never a good sign. NO BET
<o></o>
Buffalo M/L
Hopefully, if I say the spread will not matter, Old Man Ted (who is the epitome of how we should all act on here) will not come in saying he is on the other side. I have been gunning for the Jets for a long time and because I am not having a good time betting I still don’t feel confident. The Bills are improved with Magahee and playing at home will hopefully turn things around so that next weeks bets can be pressed up.
<o></o>
One final thought
People on here are always talking about money management and while I have no doubt some, like Ted are genuine in their postings; I feel the great majority are just going through the motions. I have been betting 40 years, successfully the last 18. I can honestly say, until I came to this site, I had never heard of money management. Not once over the last 20 years dealing with pro-gamblers, so called sharps did I hear any of them mention it? Maybe it’s a different environment, in Britain, we were brought up with the axiom, if it doesn’t pay flat, forget it. Just a thought.
<o></o>
Best of luck this Weekend.
<o></o>
<o></o>